While Universal Search is interesting, it's certainly not a new concept. According to Dan Dodge, Alta vista introduced a similar concept over Ten years ago (1997) - integrating multi-media search results as part of regular text search results. Very similar to what Google is today calling Universal Search. At the time, AltaVista returned regular Algo results along with photos, videos, audio, and news. After a brief trial period the idea was scrapped because it didn't quite catch on with users.
At the time, users seemed to prefer Algo Results (10 Blue Links), and may have felt that the other features were "noise" or unnecessary distractions. When presented with all these results they consistently clicked on the text results and ignored the photos, videos, audio. They sometimes clicked on the News results. The users wanted deeper, faster, more relevant text results.
I'm going to hypothesize that - users preferred to keep the User Experience for Portals and Search Engines different. One thing Universal Search definitely does - is present a portal like look and feel. Also, performance was definitely an issue back in the 90's - and Universal Search would have severely impacted page load times.
Microsoft and Yahoo already offer a similar value proposition. Microsoft has Imagine Live Search which is a new experimental search engine from Windows Live. Ask has Ask X, and Yahoo has it's Alpha offering. All of these SERPs offer a mixture of results all on the same page.
Will "Universal Search" become popular with users? How will Search Engines make money with this SERP - I don't see any prominent sponsored links? What will be the criteria for ranking vertical search features vs. algo weblinks on SERPs.
We'll just have to wait and see...............
1 comment:
Oi, achei teu blog pelo google tá bem interessante gostei desse post. Quando der dá uma passada pelo meu blog, é sobre camisetas personalizadas, mostra passo a passo como criar uma camiseta personalizada bem maneira. Até mais.
Post a Comment